Quebec-based Bombardier, Inc., the new owner of Evinrude and Johnson
engines, has agreed to recall thousands of defective 200-hp and
225-hp engines built by now-defunct Outboard Marine Corp. (OMC).
The action, clearly an effort to restore public confidence in the
brand, particularly those with Ficht fuel injection technology,
involves over 11,000 engines built for the 1999 and 2000 model
years.
In concert with Bombardier’s recall in late March, the U.S.
Coast Guard issued a public safety advisory based on OMC’s
warning that engine fuel leaks in some 1999 and 2000 Ficht Ram
Injection engines could cause fires and explosions.
Just weeks before filing for bankruptcy protection
in December, OMC issued a service bulletin to its dealers, alerting
them that
1999 and 2000 200-hp and 225-hp Ficht Ram Injection engines could
catch fire or explode. The vaguely worded bulletin downplays
the seriousness of a problem about which the company’s internal
records show it was well aware for over a year and a half. There
is no evidence at this time that other Ficht outboards are affected.
Fuel leaks from multiple sources within the engines
are reportedly the cause of the problem. Because volatile gasoline
vapors and
liquid fuel ignite easily when sprayed on hot surfaces or when
exposed to sparks, BoatUS advises owners of these engines against
operating them until an OMC-trained mechanic can inspect them.
The engines’ track record bears out this warning.
Documents obtained from the U.S. Coast Guard list
over 60 separate complaints of fires and explosions reported
to OMC by owners, dealers
and mechanics between early 1999 and up to just a few days before
OMC’s bankruptcy petition was filed on December 22. For example,
OMC’s records contain the following incident report involving
a 2000 200-hp Ficht engine:
"I was out alone, about 10 miles off the coast of Cape May
when my engine started to behave erratically,” Ed Metzner
of Sicklerville, NJ, told BoatUS “I made it back to the
dock under reduced power and prepared to set my dock lines. At
this point my engine exploded followed by a large fireball with
the fire spreading to the adjacent water.
“
My immediate injuries were second degree burns from ankle to
knee and my heart went into atrial fibrillation. Other medical
complications set in later and I was pretty much out of action
for five months. Damage to the engine and boat was extensive," he
said.
A seasoned boat owner, Metzner told BoatUS, “I won’t
go back onto the boat with that engine on board. It terrifies me
to think of what might have happened if I had my grandchildren
with me.”
Metzner’s account is in stark contrast to the following
description of the incident found in OMC’s records:
“Customer had problems with engine missing...He
went back to the dock and noticed engine on fire. Customer extinguished
with fire extinguisher...called three days later to report he was
in
hospital, suffering from an infection due to injury suffered
when he jumped off boat.”
Ellen Keirnan, now-bankrupt OMC’s coordinator of claims
and litigation, admitted that an alert similar to the one sent
to OMC dealers was written – but never sent – to engine
owners.
“The letter to customers was never released, as OMC filed
for bankruptcy...before that could be accomplished,” Keirnan
stated. Had OMC acknowledged the defect and initiated a recall
beforehand, the cash-strapped company would have been obligated
to notify the public and make repairs at no cost to owners. A recall’s
dark cloud could also have jeopardized OMC’s value at bankruptcy
auction.
“Accident reports run all the way from a small fire extinguished
by the boat owner, to an explosion that blew the engine cowling
75 feet into the air,” said Phil Cappel, chief of the Coast
Guard’s Recreational Boating Product Assurance office. OMC
records describe only a handful of minor burns, but both the Coast
Guard and BoatUS have received reports of serious injuries involving
the 200-hp and 225-hp engines.
“Initially, we thought that one of the problems was a plastic
fuel line OMC began using inside the engine, instead of the more
expensive metal fuel lines used on earlier Ficht models,” Cappel
told BoatUS “Upon further investigation, we realized it
is a combination of things: torque from the engine and fuel system
parts that aren’t clamped or fastened properly.”
Fuel separators used on the Ficht engines are one
source for leaks, according to an OMC mechanic who worked on
several of these engines. “In
hot weather, the fuel in the separator expands after the engine
is stopped or sometimes in real hot weather just the sun shining
on the motor cover causes enough heat expansion to push the top
off the canister.
“OMC made parts to beef up the tops to prevent this from
happening,” he said, adding, “They just chose to ignore
the situation and continue to handle complaints on a case-by-case
basis. They went so far as to call back any older vapor separators
we had with us in our service trucks and replaced them with new
ones.
“When I asked why they wanted them returned, they said ‘You
do not need to know and keep quiet about it,’” he said. “When
it blows the motor cover off, we call it a ‘911 code — motor
cover above expected range,’” he added, referring to
the usual procedure of classifying warranty repairs by code numbers.
Bombardier’s decision to conduct a recall campaign comes
as a pleasant surprise to Ficht engine owners and spells a promising
start for the Canadian firm’s revamping of two classic American
engine makes (see related article, Bombardier
Throws OMC Owners a Lifeline). In addition to promising retroactive warranty coverage
for 2000 and 2001 engines, Bombardier reportedly obtained $3.5
million from OMC’s assets to pay for this recall.
In a related matter, Paul Rabe, a former OMC vice
president of North American sales and marketing, alleges in a
complaint filed
with the bankruptcy court that he advised then-OMC President, David
Jones, about “the safety risks and hazards involved in selling
the defective engines.”
According to court documents, Rabe’s opposition to the sale
of Ficht engines was “based on his good faith belief that
the engines were dangerous and could lead to serious personal injury.” He
alleges that he lost his job in retaliation for complaining about
Ficht engine safety problems, as well as for complaining about
alleged price fixing and violations of trade secrets agreements
by OMC. Rabe’s complaint came to light in court documents
in which he claims he was denied over $1 million in a severance
package when OMC went bankrupt.
OMC’s two-stroke Ficht outboards have been
plagued with problems since they were introduced in 1997 in response
to Clean
Air Act requirements to reduce hydrocarbon emissions. Ficht fuel
injection technology was supposed to reduce emissions by 70% to
80% while increasing fuel efficiency, but early engines became
fouled with abrasive soot when operated at low rpm levels. As a
result, complete breakdowns occurred while engine hour meters were
still registering in the single digits.
Many Ficht owners were sidelined as their engines went through
repeated cycles of breakdowns, repairs, factory upgrades and
breakdowns. Thousands of engines needed repairs, at a cost of
about $1,000 each.
The engine maker ceased production for a few months of research
and development and promised that newly designed Ficht Ram Injection
engines would do the trick. Production of the revamped engines
began in late 1998 for the 1999 model year.
By April 1999, however, OMC records show the company was already
aware of fires and explosions involving certain of the new Ficht
engines. A retrofit kit was developed to correct problems, as was
a video to teach dealers and mechanics how to make repairs, but
it took over a year before OMC went public, even on a limited basis,
with the news.
“This upgrade is extremely important in that we have found
ways to reduce the likelihood of fuel leaks, which can be a potentially
hazardous condition,” dealers were warned in the OMC bulletin
dated November 2000. Some dealers didn’t receive their copies
until mid-December.
BoatUS has learned that repair materials, including software,
fuel system components and engine cover modifications, once difficult
to obtain, will now be provided by Bombardier.
“I suspect there are thousands of these engines out there,” said
Cappel. “I don’t know what else we can do besides warn
the public.” The Coast Guard’s fleet is also affected,
he said. Hundreds of the 200-hp and 225-hp fuel-injected outboard
engines are used on Coast Guard RIB inflatables, but an attorney
for OMC hadn’t responded to Coast Guard inquiries, Cappel
said in March.
The Ficht Ram Injection debacle is just the latest
example of OMC management’s failure to guide its customers, dealers
and employees through the bankruptcy process. Earlier, the company
unceremoniously announced that it would no longer provide warranty
service or parts to customers. Dealers were left with large inventories
of parts and no factory support, while thousands of employees received
pink slips with their last paychecks three days before Christmas.
And, according to EPA documents, a massive toxic waste clean up
at OMC’s Waukegan headquarters was never completed.
The former industry giants’ assets — a dozen boat
companies, including Chris Craft, Four Winds, Hydra-Sports, Stratos
and Seaswirl, in addition to Evinrude and Johnson outboard engine
operations and Ficht technology — were auctioned earlier
this year for $95 million to Bombardier and Genmar Corp., parent
company of Wellcraft, Hatteras, Larson and others. Genmar purchased
only the boat manufacturing operations and is not involved in the
engine campaign.
For more information about the OMC Ficht outboard
engine recall, call the U.S. Coast Guard’s InfoLine, 800-368-5647,
or visit their Web site, www.uscgboating.org.
Information about the recall is also available from Bombardier,
847-689-7090.
OMC engine owners with unresolved warranty issues unrelated to
the Ficht engine problems can find out how to file their claims
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court by calling 888-232-6814, referencing
OMC case #00-37405.
(c) Copyright BoatUS Magazine, May 2001